This proposal outlines a system designed to facilitate both political and open debates using AI models, specifically GPTs with preset hardline stances, to simulate parliamentary-style discussions. The goal is to provide a structured environment for debates where complex topics can be explored, and theoretical compromises can be suggested, potentially aiding real-life decision-making.

Separation of Chambers

The forum would be divided into two distinct chambers:

• Political Chamber: Designed as a tool for governments and democratic processes, the political chamber is entirely secluded from the open forum. This chamber would be isolated to prevent any data sharing or interaction with the open platform. It would run on its own hardware resources, ensuring that any technical issues affecting the open forum do not impact political debates.
• Open Forum: This forum is open to broader public debates on various subjects. The open forum allows participants to engage in discussions, which can range from social, scientific, or philosophical topics, while remaining separate from the political chamber.

Role of Speaker GPT

The Speaker GPT would serve as the neutral and unbiased moderator for both chambers. Its responsibilities include:

• Ensuring debates remain productive and civil.
• Calling recesses in case of memory overflows or discussions entering endless loops.
• Temporarily setting aside debates that require off-debate resolution or additional oversight.
• Proposing adapted GPTs for future debates, subject to approval by the moderation or admin crew.

Moderation and Admin Structure

• Political Chamber: Government bodies would have more interactive functions in this chamber, including the ability to moderate debates. However, ultimate control remains with the Speaker GPT. A neutral three-person admin team would oversee the system, intervening only if the Speaker GPT is unable to resolve an issue.
• Open Forum: A control structure would be in place to handle potential abuse. Participants would be separated from onlooking viewers, and moderators would manage interactions. The moderation and admin teams would ensure smooth functioning, preventing disruptions.

Reporting Mechanism

Both forums would feature a reporting system where users can file support tickets. These tickets would be handled by the moderation system and crew. If necessary, issues could be escalated to the Speaker GPT or the admin team.

Discussion Boards

The open forum would include an online discussion board where viewers can discuss specific topics. Moderators would manage these discussions, ensuring they stay on track. The discussion board allows broader conversations to take place, with the potential for the forum’s GPTs to learn from these discussions and adapt over time.

GPT Adaptation and Learning

The Speaker GPT would propose new GPTs based on emerging discussions in the open forum. These adapted GPTs would join the roster of debaters for future debates, extending the forum’s conflict resolution potential. Final approval for the inclusion of new GPTs would rest with the moderation and admin crew.

Service Records

Each GPT would have a service record similar to a patch log, tracking when it was active and what changes were made. The full service record would be available to admins and moderators. A less technical, compact version would be provided for public review. Periodic public updates would summarize any changes, and additional updates could be requested if deemed necessary.